Permanently-becoming creativity is preferable to creativity becoming permanent

No single work in Leake Street stands out for too long, and none can claim territorial exclusivity for more than a few consecutive days before it gets crossed-over, or becomes the collateral victim of a freshly painted graffscape. In this equation of high-frequency activity, the way things look comes to matter less and less, as there is no time to grieve over a skillful piece or protect a hard-laboured picture. Leake Street shows that it is not the aesthetics of image production, but the collective action of producing images, that makes a difference for the quality of urban spaces. This difference was demonstrated in hard measurements such as the drop in crime and anti-social activity, but it significantly affects softer frequencies such as involvement, participation and sense of ownership and connection. These will never be accomplished by adding more pristine murals to a place, but by allowing people to transform and leave their imprint on it. It is the difference between permanently-becoming creative, and maintaining a forged recipe for creativity by designing out participation and excluding transformative involvement.

5.715.72

Would you go in, then? And what would it take to make you appreciate the qualities of such a space, if not its complete exposure of plurality and inclusivity? The alternatives should make us suspicious and alert.

5.73

Advertisements